The page you're viewing is for Korean (Korea) region.

Vertiv 영업담당자에게 문의하시면 고객의 고유한 요구에 맞게 복잡한 설계를 구성할 수 있습니다. Vertiv는 대규모 프로젝트에 대한 기술 지침이 필요한 조직에 필요한 지원을 제공할 수 있습니다.

자세히 보기

많은 고객이 Vertiv 리셀러 파트너와 협력하여 IT 애플리케이션을 위한 Vertiv 제품을 구매합니다. 파트너는 다양한 교육을 받고 전문 경험을 보유하고 있으며 Vertiv 제품을 통해 전체 IT 및 인프라 솔루션을 지정, 판매, 지원할 수 있는 독보적인 위치에 있습니다.

리셀러 찾기

필요한 것이 무엇인지 이미 알고 계십니까? 온라인 구매 및 배송의 편리함을 원하십니까? 특정 범주의 Vertiv 제품은 온라인 리셀러를 통해 구매할 수 있습니다.


리셀러 찾기

제품 선택에 도움이 필요하십니까? 여러분에게 적합한 솔루션을 안내할 수 있는 우수한 Vertiv 전문가와 상담하십시오.



Vertiv 전문가에게 문의하기

The page you're viewing is for Korean (Korea) region.

Selecting The Right Economizer

David Klusas •

If you're operating a data center near farms or forests trying to use airside economizers to bring fresh outside air for free cooling can be a problem.

There are many efficiency benefits to utilizing outside air for economization, but not every situation is right for bringing outside air into a data center. Each type of economizer has its own advantages and challenges, depending on data center goals, site requirements, geography and climate.

I recently visited four data centers, from Canada to Utah, including the one next to the mink farm, and found multiple occasions where airside economization was not the ideal solution, despite its energy savings.

One data center in Canada was near a heavily forested area, and the company was concerned about smoke from forest fires entering the facility. A data center in Washington was next to an apple orchard, which creates a lot of dust during harvest. Another is using 100% outside air for economization, but has an 8MW chiller plant for backup, in case they ever need to close the outside air dampers and recirculate the indoor air. That's a HUGE initial investment for only a backup system.

Using Economizers

Data centers have made cutting energy consumption a priority to save money and meet government regulations. Cooling accounts for almost 40 percent of data center energy usage, so it's a main focal point for driving energy savings. More recently, water conservation has become a priority in the selection of cooling systems and economization strategies. At the same time, relative cost and the payback periods remain key factors in selecting these large, expensive systems.

All economizer systems use either outside air and/or water to reduce or eliminate mechanical cooling in data center cooling units. These economizer systems generate significant energy savings of up to 50 percent, compared to legacy systems. The first decision most data center managers make in selecting an economization strategy is the type of data center environment they want to operate, which naturally then leads to a decision on whether or not to bring outside air into the data center. As a result, there are two primary economizer designs typically deployed in data centers: direct and indirect.

The ultimate goal of direct and indirect systems is to provide free cooling to a room or facility, thus reducing the overall energy consumption of the facility. The way each system economizes greatly impacts the temperature and humidity environment that can be efficiently maintained within the data center.

Direct Economizer

This brings outside air into the data center using a system of ductwork, dampers, and sensors. These systems usually have lower capital costs than other forms of economization and work well in moderate climates. In the right climate, direct outside air economizers can be very efficient and an effective economization strategy, but do introduce the risk for contaminants and wide humidity swings into the data center. For maximum annual savings, a wide acceptable supply air temperature and humidity window needs to be implemented in the data center. For highly critical data centers, the risk of outdoor contaminants and wide temperature and humidity swings is sometimes too significant for comfort.

Indirect Economizer

In contrast, indirect economizers can offer significant energy savings while limiting the prior concerns. Indirect economizers do not bring outside air into the data center, but instead use an indirect method to transfer heat from the data center to outside the building. There are primarily three types of indirect economizer technologies:

  • Air-to-air heat exchangers, or heat wheels, in a wet or dry state

  • Pumped refrigerant economizers, such as the Liebert® DSE™ system economizer

  • Cooling towers for chilled water systems

Sensible air-to-air plate frame heat exchangers transfer heat between two air streams but maintain a complete separation, thus eliminating the opportunity for contamination and transfer of humidity into the data center space. These units can be operated in a dry state, or can be sprayed with water to increase their effectiveness and hours of economization. Heat wheels offer similar qualities to air-to-air plate frame heat exchangers, but can have higher air leakage rates and require additional maintenance to ensure performance.

More energy savings

The Liebert DSE system is a direct-expansion (DX) system that utilizes an integrated pumped refrigerant economizer to maximize annual energy savings and provide superior availability without the need for separate economization coils. When outdoor ambient temperatures are low enough, the integrated refrigerant pump is used to circulate the refrigerant in lieu of the compressor to maintain the desired supply air temperature. The refrigerant pump uses a fraction of the energy used by the compressor. As the outdoor ambient temperatures rise, the Liebert DSE system automatically transitions on compressors to maintain the desired supply air temperature. Its integrated Liebert iCOM™ thermal controls work to automatically optimize the entire system to provide more free-cooling throughout the year.

Because of its efficiency advantages, the Liebert DSE system was recently approved for use in California data centers under Title 24. Its economizer was shown to reduce time dependent valuation (TDV) by 8-10 percent and, since it uses no water, save around 4 million gallons of water annually in a 1MW data center, compared to water economizers.
Initial installation costs for any of these economizer options can be affected by how well the technology under consideration fits into the overall design of the existing facility. The amount of indoor, outdoor or rooftop space required for situating the units will affect the selection decision. Chilled water systems with cooling towers tend to be the most costly, because of the high system first cost, use of water and a higher maintenance burden relating to their complexity.

Vertiv offers options for all of these economizer technologies. There is no single economizer technology that fits every situation. Each has its own strengths based on location and application, and each has its challenges. Fortunately, there's an economization option for virtually every location – even next to a mink farm or forest.

최신 트렌드, 기술 및 뉴스에 대한 정보를 얻으려면 블로그를 구독하십시오.

관련 자료

PARTNERS
개요
파트너 로그인

언어 & 지역