The page you're viewing is for Korean (Korea) region.

Vertiv 영업담당자에게 문의하시면 고객의 고유한 요구에 맞게 복잡한 설계를 구성할 수 있습니다. Vertiv는 대규모 프로젝트에 대한 기술 지침이 필요한 조직에 필요한 지원을 제공할 수 있습니다.

자세히 보기

많은 고객이 Vertiv 리셀러 파트너와 협력하여 IT 애플리케이션을 위한 Vertiv 제품을 구매합니다. 파트너는 다양한 교육을 받고 전문 경험을 보유하고 있으며 Vertiv 제품을 통해 전체 IT 및 인프라 솔루션을 지정, 판매, 지원할 수 있는 독보적인 위치에 있습니다.

리셀러 찾기

필요한 것이 무엇인지 이미 알고 계십니까? 온라인 구매 및 배송의 편리함을 원하십니까? 특정 범주의 Vertiv 제품은 온라인 리셀러를 통해 구매할 수 있습니다.


리셀러 찾기

제품 선택에 도움이 필요하십니까? 여러분에게 적합한 솔루션을 안내할 수 있는 우수한 Vertiv 전문가와 상담하십시오.



Vertiv 전문가에게 문의하기

The page you're viewing is for Korean (Korea) region.

I bet you never thought you would hear anything like this from someone who sits on the board of The Green Grid. The truth of the matter is if you have been following industry recommendations, adopting Green Grid’s data center maturity model (DCMM), our Energy Logic 2.0 strategies, and have a PUE in the 1.3 to 1.5 range you may be approaching the practical limit for your data center. But please do keep measuring your PUE.

Wait a minute – what about Google, Facebook, Microsoft and others who are claiming PUEs of 1.1 or even lower? Shouldn’t we all be chasing these levels of ‘efficiency’?

That depends a great deal on your business model. If you are an Internet driven organization with a billion+ connected customers, globally distributed data centers with in-region redundancy, and little to no concern over data center outages then chase the lowest possible PUE. In all likelihood you are not competing with the above entities. Your executives and shareholders don’t want to consider sharing the risk levels associated with those types of data center facilities that are operated with the overarching philosophy of failure-is-an-option.

With today’s technology, advancements in material science (IGBTs), innovations in power / cooling systems, circuits, controls, etc. we can design, build, and safely operate robust Tier IV facilities with a PUE in the 1.2 – 1.3 range. For existing facilities we can deploy new power (UPS), thermal (direct / indirect evaporative or pumped refrigerant), bolt-on upgrades, and DCIM controls to bring ‘legacy’ facilities into a whole new range of PUE performance without giving up one iota of resiliency and availability.

Trying to drive to a lower PUE from here requires a whole new architecture. One best achieved with a new construction project. However this architecture will be less robust and fall outside your current operational practices placing the entire facility and operations on the steep slope of the universal learning curve. Statistics indicate you will experience a much higher failure rate. This move to further reduce PUE comes at a potential significant cost. Do the arithmetic – will you recoup enough in energy savings to warrant perhaps a 10X increase in outages?

The next time someone asks you why you aren’t pursuing a PUE of 1.1 tell them Jack said your PUE may be good enough already.

최신 트렌드, 기술 및 뉴스에 대한 정보를 얻으려면 블로그를 구독하십시오.

관련 자료

PARTNERS
개요
파트너 로그인

언어 & 지역